ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING FOR SEMI-AUTONOMOUS GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS IN THE JAPANESE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

 

Kiyoshi Yamamoto

The Center for National University Finance

JAPAN

2-1-2 Hitotsu-Bashi Chiyoda-Ku

Tokyo, 101-0003, JAPAN

Tel: 81-3-4212-6202

Fax: 81-3-4212-6250

Email: kiyoshi@zam.go.jp

 

ABSTRACT

Separation of execution functions from policy making in Japanese central government will start in 2001. The separation is called as agencification, which endows execution bodies with a greater autonomy through strengthening accountability for their performance. It naturally leads to shift the management focus from input to output, therefore, financial management system would transfer from cash to accrual basis: accrual based system focuses on measurement of resources consumed to product outputs.

However, there exist several variations in relationships between budgeting and accounting even though adopting an accrual system. Agencification in Japan also shows a distinct system for harmonising autonomy and accountability, while the semi-autonomous organizations shall adopt accrual based accounting and prepare the financial statements. The distinct point is that finance for the bodies is divided into two types of fund in accordance with their activities: the grant for operating costs and the capital expenditures from the central government. Also the funding is related to accounting regulations. The operating costs are recorded in the profit and loss statement, while the depreciations of fixed assets financed by the capital expenditures do not appear in the profit and loss statement, but directly be deducted from capital reserves in the balance sheet. The regulations are based on the concepts that semi-autonomous bodies have full discretion to use the grant for operating activities though the minister in charge retains to make a decision on investment for fixed assets. The accounting principle presumes that it is necessary for the bodies to maintain net operating balance at a positive level, not keeping net worth.

The regulations therefore contradict with GAAP. In addition every fixed asset is recorded in the balance sheet, although the bodies are unable to make a decision on replacement or construction of fixed assets, that is, could not fully control the assets. Consequently, the regulations shall significantly restrict the autonomy for capital assets. In this regard, two alternatives, i.e. integrating two funds into a grant for current costs or renting the fixed assets from the central government will be indicated and compared in terms of greater autonomy and improving public accountability.